Cyclonopedia: Complicity with Anonymous Materials

Cyclonopedia: Complicity with Anonymous Materials

Jeff VanderMeer recently recommended Cyclonopedia, who had it brought to his attention by China Mieville and having read it I have to admit it is an incredibly unique and quite brilliant effort. It is difficult to know where to even begin with Reza Negarestani’s novel, even the word novel seems somehow incorrect, it resembles more a fictional treatise on the Middle East, addressing everything from archaeology, history and philosophy to linguistics, numerology, the war on terror and the occult. Discovered in a hotel room by a woman who had travelled to Istanbul to meet a contact who never showed, the manuscript purports to have been written by Negarestani and centres on the radical theories of missing Iranian architect Dr. Hamid Parsani. Parsani, leprous and lovesick, is either a genius or quite insane, the smart money being on that he is probably both, and as Negarestani extrapolates his theories, we see that their logical conclusions lead to something horrific.

I can’t even begin to describe those theories here, there are far too many of them and they are far too complex. I’m not even sure I understood half of what Parsani was arguing, and the half that I did understand needs to be unpacked and meditated upon before I can reach any conclusions myself. The language is academic and dense and the author at times seems purposely ambiguous, contributing to a growing sense of inauthenticity about the whole thing. Despite this, Negarestani’s ideas are compelling as they are so far out there. The Middle East as a sentient being, petropolitics as oil both drives and fuels the Techno-Capitalist war machine, oil as a blob like sentient deity, the idea of desert being the ultimate levelled environment, war between the Earth’s Chthonic core and the sun and putrefaction as a mode of creation; these are just some of the theories put forward by Parsani and unpacked and expanded on by the fictional Negarestani. The end result of all this, via ()hole theory, is openness which allows the Outside to get in, equated to the Lovecraftian Elder Gods. The terrifying thing about this kind of openness, butchering from within, is the more one tries to ward it off, the more open one becomes.   

As a book, Cyclonopedia is impossible to pin down. It reads like Aristotle by way of Heidegger, Lovecraft, Crowley, and Chomsky to name a few. It encompasses numerous disciplines from the esoteric in numerology, demonology and Kabbalah to the more concrete in history, archaeology, physics and economics. He discusses Koontz’s Phantoms, The Thing, and quotes McCarthy’s Blood Meridian. The first read feels like a surface read, a mild skirmish to scout out the battlefield before hand, next time (and there will be a next time) it will be read slower with notes and secondary research. The countless multiple layers and the numerous idea threads make this a book perfect for rereading as it seems every new read will reveal something you missed before. Some people will hate this novel as it has no characters or plot in the traditional sense and the language is complex and somewhat dry at times, but those interested in epistemology will find something to love here. Without a doubt one of the more unique and interesting novels of the last decade, there simply is nothing like Cyclonopedia. What is it ultimately about? Love I suppose, but for that to make sense, you’ll have to find out yourself. Infectious, it’ll bore into your skull and leave nothing behind but the holes and naphtha. Read it at your peril.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.paul-charles-smith.com/wp-trackback.php?p=817

Comments

Paul: I’m reading this now. Sent for it after reading about it at Jeff’s blog. It is rather dense, but there are also these great sections of fancy — for instance the killing of the giant worm by pouring molten metal in its maw, etc. I think I get the petro-political part but I’ve not finished so I’m not sure yet was the final word is on it. I don’t know anything about the mythology of the region, and so am not sure what is fictional and what is actual tradition, but I like that. At times the dense academic writing comes across to me as fantasy. There’s a great facility with language here, that’s one thing that’s very evident. Am enjoying it and would like to see what you unpack from it when the unpacking begins.

Yes, I must get this as soon as funds allow! As soon as I read about on Jeff Vandermeer’s blog, I was totally hooked on the idea of Cyclonopedia.

Sounds great! Here is another interesting bit: http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/93888521

Jeff> I think you hit the nail on the head with the whole difficulty telling fact from fiction thing, I love it when novels do that. I’m now two thirds of the way through October Dark (should have a review up tomorrow or friday) and as you note in the introduction, Herter does a similar thing.

Paul: I didn’t think of the Herter while reading it, but, yeah, I know what you mean. In a different way it reminded me of House of Leaves.

I was thinking House of Leaves as well as I was reading it.

Post a comment